>>513360876
>The fact there's no hunger for this, leads me to believe it's intentional.
Yes, but you're limited to who the fuck even wants to be a Jannie and do it for free and has time to sit here all day cleaing up shit piles. I'm heading out for work in 10 minutes and generally have better shit to do all day every day, so I have to rely on some terminally online shutin to be Janny, the problem is that guy is probably an INCEL loser who finds e-celebs twitter and reddit to be very important.
Jannies notwithstanding though, 10 years ago most of the shit that bump limits here now wouldn't get more than 1 or 2 replies because 4chan users of old could sniff out bullshit/bait a little better.
>>513361131
>I mean, this is the "realest" kind of conversation I have on social media now and it's not filtered,
I'm not in here all that much but I'd say it's less than 3 times a week that I feel that I'm engaging with an actual human in good faith. Again, the big issue is who even doesn't have better shit to do with their life than sit here rage-posting at the same tired and obvious old bait, e-celebrity gossip, and social media screncaps endlessly.
