2 results for "2aae7c800cf3c9b1c49d560d77c539cd"
Wtf? Not b& yet?
>>282228684
But this was tried months ago in other page though. I loved IDs but most /a/nons would not like it. And some motives were strange like they would not be able to play both sides in discussions or that they would not be able to fake discussions to bump the thread they created.
With Id's most people pushing false narratives would have it harder and if you add the option to ignore all posts of certain ID in just 2 clicks it would not be ideal for that kind of trolls. That would means the threads would be more void than now in the first moments, but i wonder if that would attract more serious anons later.