>>2121681
everyone thinks their specific unique people needs to be added, but that's why AoK were family groups that fit various circumstances.

>Vlachs are needed
agree
>Swiss aren't needed
could be represented with a Suebi blanket for other Alpine Germanics like Bavarians, Austrians, or even the Lombards. Fine being Goths/Teutons
>South Slavic ... sorely missed
Sclaveni, yes, to avoid any specific Balkan preference
>Permian/Finish ... sorely missed
Not really, they're infantry barbars. Use Goths
>Spanish can get Aragonese, Occitan, and Basque friends
At best, the Aragonese who can represent all three, but it's otherwise spleetbloat that does nothing better than Spanish. Fine being Goths
>Albania, Sardinia, and Venetians
utterly stupid. Albania can be Sclaveni, there were no relevant Sardinian powers and can just be lumped in, with Venetians, into Italians
>Britonspleet
Anglo-Saxons are Goths
>Oceana
One blanket civ at best, the rest are bloat
>Americas/South Americas
Mississippians, Purepacha, maybe Chicimeca, and Mapuche. This isn't EU, they need actual differences
>Africa
Songhai, Nubians, Swahili, Kongolese. The rest are redundant; one Central Sahel, one Jungle Africa, and one east Coast and can represent the others.
>Saracenspleet
No such thing as Kurdish Empire, but something to differentiate Mesopotamian Arabs from the Egyptian Arabs would be good. Hadrhami is fine, Saracens are fine being Egyptians.
I'd be for splitting Andalusians from Moors because they had their own ~750 years of unique history, but, again, bloat, mechanics, and uniqueness
>Alans
indifferent
>Azeris, Caspians, Kalaj
Persians
>Siberian Turks
Tartars, irrelevant
>Pashtun
Hindustanis
>>Indiaspleet 2.0
>Telegu and Kannadiga
Dravidians, who also cover the Tamils
>Gond and Odias
combine into one
>Assamese
bloat
>Kashmiri and Sindhi
Hindustani
>Tai and Chams
agree, but bloat
>Indonesia
one Blanket
>Xianbei
part of the Wei :3
>Ryukyu and Emishi
bloat and too limited
>no USA