>>18748473
>Why is it total bunk?
Because AEW is declining faster than cable.
>[autistic screeching]
The reason why WWE's ratings go down is also because its quality goes down. But you see, WWE is still good enough that millions of people choose watch it. AEW, on the other hand, is so fucking bad now that Dynamite just sunk to 400k in its regular time slot unopposed. Whatever quality you think WWE is, it's much higher than AEW's quality.

>>514908497
you're a niggerbrain retard that won't take any answer that doesn't confirm your gay bias, lil bro.
you need to go back.