>>60905042
My analogies are fleshed out in description. Yours are arbitrary and could be said about anything and your only argument is "they use it now so they always will." The analogy doesn't follow from that. The analogy of moving deck chairs on the Titanic with GPI does though. Lol
>Trust
I guess it's good that ILP and XRP
are trustless and counterpartyless and completely decentralized then! Lol
>Fednow
"Gemini crap." Lol Here is a thread detailing many outright partnerships with primary sources given. Some are not partnerships-many are-others have second order connections etc.:
https://x.com/flrmoondotxyz/status/1888449409706578297
>Digital Euro
You are right in principle. I meant to say "sandbox" at the end. It isn't the 2023 trial though and is from a 2025 program. I just meant to show they are taking it seriously amid other mentions:
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecb.exploratoryworknewtechnologies202506_annex02.cs.pdf?93d7398bed92845d9685a9d6ee83fa66
I am pretty sure that you are right and that they were also included in a 2023 trial though.
>Half truths
Lol No. You are literally just not understanding arguments because you don't understand the basics of what you are talking about and are mischaracterizing what I say, replying to the mischaracterization in ways that usually even don't internally make sense and now weirdly saying I am doing it somehow?
>disrupted
The reason is that blockchain did not exist until recently. And interledger formed after blockchain. Swift has been a messaging consortium. Multiple people in Trump's admin say our payment systems are outdated. Trump literally just signed an executive order to "modernize them." Where is Netscape? Where are the covered wagons?