>>40973906
David and Isaiah prophesying through the mediation of YHWH does not in anyway automatically collapse the personhood of YHWH into EL Elyon or vice versa. The Logos is preexistent to the elohim.

What you said is also your interpretation ofc, which brings me to my next point:

Revelatory truth must be interpreted to be understood and disseminated - and theres an enormous practical likelihood that that gap between what people can understand through interpretation is exactly why YHWH is such a shitty deity in the old testament - the resolution of understanding increases 100 fold once we have the words of Jesus.
>Interpretation is still necessary
>But it requires absurd layers of abstraction to allow for the things the old testament God 'communicated' to the Israelites.

>And anyway
>To know anything, you must know it directly
>Not know it only intellectually
>Jesus invites us to abide in him and unify with him in a relational and experiential way, to live in him

The human frame named Yeshua is quite a bit different in the Astral than what doctrinal institutional Christianity thinks him to be.

And honestly, if you must have scripture, a straight reading of the NT brings you way closer to the truth then any layered doctrinal interpretation or denomination - including the gnostic ones.

If anyone wants to ask for clarifying details from Jesus as he lives now in the immaterial realms - he doesn't have dail up but there's answers that I have taken down over time. Feel free to ask