>>4458726
>Just $850 for one of the most blatantly crippled (for everything) cameras on earth and a kit zoom
"I want a camera that has no shutter, no flash connection, no viewfinder, shitty autofocus that makes fuji look like an EOS R3, snoy colors, and a 1/30 readout" - NO photographers or videographers ever

I guess panasonic thought the sony a7c needed more fans created through showing the world how much worse a snoy could be.
Just kidding panasonic actually thought "leica will revoke our access to L mount if we make this camera good because their lawyers already explained we can't outdo the Q"

Please don't buy this POS. You could get literally any other camera and it would be better, like a fuji xe5 or yes even a snoy (the colors and build quality would only be just as bad). Oh who am I kidding? You're not actually a photographer. You probably take mid streetscapes on your daily dog walks so you can post on /p/ and tell people what gear you use. It's a high level of participation in brand wars. That's the only reason you're posting the receipt, just like the snoys do.
>look at me i bought an a7c/ii/r!

>inb4 julia trotti fake white balance video, edited for emphasis

>>4457327
>who needs primes?
>26-60 f2.7 equivalent
people who have the skill to work with primes need primes so we can avoid carrying hideously large, embarrassing cope bazookas like that. holy shit lmfao. do snoy people really look at this and think it's excusable?

a full frame camera with a smaller, cheaper 24-70 f4 zoom will still take higher quality photos 99% of the time because 1: equivalent settings are not a mandatory activity 2: equivalence doesn't even work 100%, and a nikon z5ii or something will still look slightly better at iso 6400 than a snoy aps-cope does at iso 3200

nikons cheapest kit lenses are better than half of snoy and ligmas lens lineup and nikons cheapest cameras have better image quality than the $2000 snoy a7iv lmao. how the fuck does snoy still live? they're starting to look almost as bad as L mount, and L mount literally cripples its body selection by being afraid to outperform leica's garbage cameras (leica might just revoke the licensing if sigma or panasonic release a camera that is actually better than a Q or SL - no way is their autofocus that bad on purpose, no way did they think omitting the shutter on a 1/24s scan sensor was actually good idea)