>>42483407
>>42483417
>>42483686
"Civil rights", as opposed to natural rights, has always been a backdoor for more government control. Natural rights basically means that unless your actions are causing some egregious harm to the common good, which is a difficult threshold to meet for most actions, you have a right to live however you please and be left alone. A legal system based on natural rights restricts the government more than it restricts you: you have a right to free speech, religion, private sexual conduct, property you own, etc, and the government is not allowed to just arbitrarily take any of that away from you. However, you're not guaranteed anything beyond that. Nobody can be compelled to hire you, rent to you, bake your cake, applaud your weird fetishes, use your pronouns, etc.

Civil rights is an inversion of the concept of natural rights. It means that rights are something provided to you by the government, which by extension means the government gets to decide what rights you have and what rights you don't have. It also means that the government can compel you to act against your will. Under civil rights, the government can compel you to hire someone, rent to someone, bake a cake for someone, use someone's pronouns, tolerate weird fetishes, etc, if not doing so would violate some arbitrary right the government has decreed that everyone has.

In the context of /jdb/ and loli in general, this means that:

>under natural rights
If you want to jerk off to drawings of fictional children in the privacy of your own home, go right ahead; you're not hurting anyone. However, most normies would probably find it a little weird, so it might be a good idea to keep quiet about it.

>under civil rights
The government has decreed that imaginary children have a right to be protected from imaginary rape taking place in the imagination. Thus, drawing or imagining fictional children being raped is a violation of the rights of imaginary children. Please remain where you are, police are on their way.

Any law or proposed law with the words "civil rights" in it should automatically make you suspicious, because sooner or later it always leads to an intrusive nanny state.