>>10390
>>10391
>>10392
Well, best I understand, the training data for LLMs would not directly contain the content, thus it shouldn't by itself contain anything illegal. Someone who understands this technology better than me is free to chime in, however.

I also don't think that it would even need to run on every board, at most it might run kind of regularly on places like /b/ and /v/, high traffic boards where there's known troublemakers of higher consequence, and only ever get rolled out termporarily for if someone starts shitting up some other board with botted spam.
Combative shitposters with a grudge are already weaponizing things like bots and altering image hashes, and I think that it would be in our own interest to try to see if there's any potential use in LLMs assisting with jannying.