>>4456535
Digital is shit unless you can afford a hasselblad (the minimum) or a phase one trichromatic back (the ideal). Shoot film.

Indeed. Unless you're spending a film budget's budget on a back and using 3 lenses that you can only afford to rent for a weekend, you're better off shooting film because the amount of time you're going to lose being buried under 100:1 coverage and making digital look like anything but a turd smoothie is wayyy more costly than an extra 400' of ektachrome and will still ruin your project. In the end film is far less $ and gives you a more focused performance bc your actors know they're going to get 1 or 2 takes and that's it. All you have to do is cut it and splice for story and continuity and you're done. then you can add some fucking jawas falling off cartoon dinosaurs 30 years later and make the world realize you're not in fact the fucking genius mastermind we all thought you were, you FFFUCK