>>520974131
>Apparently, being colonized by the Netherlands was better than being occupied by Japan.
Huh.
Maybe everyone should reflect on that.

>>519360097
>For a column march and pivot, the civilian casualty rate of the Belgian occupation was nuts.
I can agree with the statistics of this observation. However, it is also explained by German claims of Belgian soldiers using their own civilian population as human shields, sniping from homes, and such.
Picrel is atrocity proof. Statistics that can be explained in other ways are not proof. Do you have proof?

>>512732588
Because jap men look like jarjar binks

Now that 80 years have passed, do you think it was wrong to drop two atomic bombs on Japan?

>>510040124
No, he's famous for being sent to a jap internment camp, even though that probably saved his family's life from propaganda-fuelled American rage.