>>519121076
>Beepboop you must consume your medicine boop

This sounds like furry flag pedo flag ops!

>>519093001
>Pedo ass terrorists
>They terrorize children's asses?

Mexico flag does!


U see these fucking bots pretending to talk to each other?

"Hello noble vermteran of war, I am a fellow Nazi"

Hahaha

Fake robots!!

>>519092833
>I am sorry to hear that dear vietnam war veteran

STFU fake ass chat bot!!

This is terrifying.

Main Bulk of Discussion:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#Roles_mentioned_in_first_paragraph:_Q/Discord

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#New_Edit_Proposal_for_Discord_Mention_in_the_Lede

Other related discussions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143#h-User:FlightTime_showed_bad_editing_etiquette_&_abused_their_admin_powers_to_thre-20231208000900

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_240#John_de_Lancie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_241#John_de_Lancie

TLDR: The user wanted to move the mention of his Discord role to be mentioned as his most well known role along with Star Trek's Q, but the other users did not agree. Do you believe that this edit was justified? Yes or no? I'm looking forward to the discussion. This edit caused quite the discord...

Vote here on who was correct: https://strawpoll.com/xVg71Y0J6yr

>>518944945
>Should be good, im looking forward to the kino
>journos refuse to follow rules
>Its not a big ask to have them be escorted and wear their credentials. Its the same as the WH and none of the journos there boycott the requirements
>Journos are used to no consequences and doing what they want, like soliciting classified information and publishing it. Basically espionage

I think this applies to psyops, not sure...

Fake news and government deception via fabricated news, and manipulation of publication

>>518924824
Insurrection powers?

Main Bulk of Discussion:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#Roles_mentioned_in_first_paragraph:_Q/Discord

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#New_Edit_Proposal_for_Discord_Mention_in_the_Lede

Other related discussions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143#h-User:FlightTime_showed_bad_editing_etiquette_&_abused_their_admin_powers_to_thre-20231208000900

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_240#John_de_Lancie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_241#John_de_Lancie

TLDR: The user wanted to move the mention of his Discord role to be mentioned as his most well known role along with Star Trek's Q, but the other users did not agree. Do you believe that this edit was justified? Yes or no? I'm looking forward to the discussion. This edit caused quite the discord...

Vote here on who was correct: https://strawpoll.com/xVg71Y0J6yr