>>24681171
I read Deleuze's on grounding, it had some distinctly Hegelian features. I can see why you're protective of your bizarro version. I secretly suspect the Deleuze may have realized something, not sure what or if it was even relevant, there's some distinct diametrically opposing concepts I encounter periodically that leave me inclined to say he may have performed the process intentionally in such a way as to disintegrate certain recognition features. It could just be something along the lines of an early work vs a later work.

By comparison, the reason Kant is traditionally used as a stoic for a facsimile of Hegel was likely due to Kant rejecting primacy of Being, doctrine of essence, and doctrine of notion. Epistemology was arguably his highest priority, or at the least the central point of his system. This produces his machine surrounded by fog persona.