>>215788988
>This lawyer shtick isn't meaningful
cross-examination predates the courtroom. Socrates was practicing elenchus thousands of years ago, and the Presocratics were heavy on purely practical dialectics
>I didn't quote the guy. I cut through what he was saying
you fundamentally misinterpreted his meaning, either mistakenly or intentionally
>All in your head.
we can go through it again if you want. or you can refer to the middle portion of this post >>215788866, which outlines your attempts at distortion based on references to your own initial arguments
>Oh I'm amused.
mfw

>>510215588
Nah, that's my dream.