>>518943283
This is bait but I'll bite anyway.

If Russia hasn't lost lots of men, why are they mobilising millions of new soldiers?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/10/14/russia-deploy-two-million-reservists-ukraine-law-change/

Let's say it's true that Russia has few casualties and Ukraine just makes things up. Then why is Russia's advance so slow? You then have to concede that Russia's troop efficiency is shit. Despite fighting a weak opponent that does no damage, the Russian army moves slower than a common snail.

And, again assuming Russian casualties are low, why then push for further mobilisation? The Russian army is completely intact and has hundreds of thousands of soldiers who are ready and fighting fit. What do you need more men for? They've all taken no damage, why not just use them to actually go deeper into Ukraine?

I know this shill won't respond, but this post is a mental exercise I suppose and for the benefit of lurkers. Russia admitting it needs millions more soldiers to fight a very weak opponent that deals no damage doesn't smell right.