>>106377008
>Well, to be fair, that seems to be a common theme across programming languages.
im not gonna say that is not true
but why compare to the worst? its not really an excuse, nor does it make the actual product better. it only changes the perception thereof, if anything
>What irks me way more is the ridiculous amount of dishonesty in the Rust community about certain of Rust's issues, for it makes it harder for everyone, themselves included, to work around, mitigate or fix Rust's issues. Selling and spreading Rust appears way more important to them than responsibility and genuine safety and security.
to an exterior observer this signals that theres ulterior motives
is the rust foundation a grift?
is it a matter of licences?
is it a political assault on the world of programming?
is it caltrops deliberately pushed by big corpo to penalize small teams?
or maybe is it all of the above?