>>150202305
>that you aren't meaningfully pointing it out or talking about it
I am, which is why you cannot engaged with the points I brought up and instead have to accuse me of being disingenuous.
> This means that you are here to accuse and won't engage in discussions
I did this in the very post you’re quoting and you’re completely ignoring those parts just to harp on this because you’re unable to argue what I said. I mean you completely ignored me calling out how wokeshit was bad, not to mention how you tried to do the whole “it’s not happening, but even if it is it’s not a bad thing” cope. Or how I pointed out how a toddler doesn’t understand most nuanced ideas or concepts yet you decided a toddler not taking an issue is somehow a point for what you were saying. So far you are just proving my point. You can’t argue anything so you have to harp on one thing, not even really engaging it and just using it as a means to say I’m being disingenuous. Which in of itself is extremely dishonest as it’s not actually engaging anything it’s just trying to create a scapegoat while making it seem like you’re arguing the point since it is part of what was said.

>>717376226
>Your interpretation of those "circumstances" seem to contradict laws of physics
Really? So you’re saying that a society that runs on financial capital in order to produce and distribute various goods and services would not be compromised if one group managed to hijack their financial system and currency? What do you think that soldiers, weapons, and supplies all just appear from thin air and that they don’t require any work or effort? You seem to not only be able to argue but fundamentally misunderstand how society and basic economics work.
>A state is a colossal social machine that consists of armed people
You’re now equating every nation to being The US since your average citizen in many nations either does not or cannot own a gun. And even then to fight back an against a whole system requires a massive amount of effort and coordination. Not to mention supplies. Oh what’s that you need to buy ammo and food? With what money will you buy it? Who are you going to buy it from? Again you seem to not understand how this works and are mindlessly saying it’s wrong.
>Britain is an absolute monarchy where power of the monarch is backed by an aristocratic class
Okay we’re done here. It’s clear you’re just some golem that regurgitating whatever your told. Britain is a constitutional monarchy bud. It’s been that way since 1689. I don’t know where you’re getting this shit but you need to do some research.
>France is ruled by its old aristocratic stratum as well
You mean the same people that fled/were nursed during the revolution? Those people? I don’t know why you insist on doing this to yourself.
>We're talking about official legend about how they "took over". I understand that you're very, very invested in it
If it’s a legend then prove it? So far you have nothing but easily rebuked claims. But you won’t prove it, you will just keep going in circles saying how it’s not happening while not being able to argue and getting btfo.