>>936664619
>refute my claims, refute my claims, refute my claims!!! no adhominems!!!
>claims get refuted
>Uh oh! *hurls ad hominem
>ad hominem pointed out
>w-well, you did it first!!!!! Tranny!!!!
So, is "namecalling" back on the table? Or are you going to refute my claim that the very first paragraph you wrote was incomprehensibly retarded?
>>936664620
Yeah haha buddy I can see it. He's got one more shot before I hit the hay.