>>4462899
You are standing right now at the peak of mount stupidity in pic related. Yes there is no objectivity to art, but it wasn't my question either.
My question is, can you through the usage of the medium itself that is photography, intentionally produce something that is likely to bring a strong emotion to a big enough of people (not just your mom and your dog, but also people who know nothing of you and your environment).
It's not a matter of me doing photography at all. It's not a matter of using the label "art" to bring value to something.
I will list a couple of examples from the recent years (outside of photography) of things I would consider art in the following posts to try and make my point clearer.