I’m beginning to see that the most outspoken anti-AI fags are massive midwits who think they’re smarter than they are.

People can generally tell when an image is AI, you’re not smart for noticing it. When someone says that an AI image is “impressive”, they’re saying that it’s impressive how far the technology has come in a short time and how much closer it’s gotten to actually being hard to tell from human-made art. Not that it’s already there.

Saying it’s impressive also doesn’t imply that you can’t see the possible future negative consequences of AI. Again, you’re a midwit if you think you’re special for having those worries.