>>106321124
>It's not, I just told you I'm using the same engine I wrote on XP right now
and I already told you it'll work due to windows 10/11's backward compatibility.
Write a decent, not-a-simple windows xp application while on windows 10/11 and make it run on xp, then we can talk
>now you've completely forgotten you've ever said that
I highlighted that part to the post you literally replied to, I literally wrote that I should have used the word compiler instead of std libs but now, it seems like the word "toolchain" would have been more appropriate
>And you wonder why people hate Indians, it's shit like this
I don't wonder though. I know very well that people will hate indians regardless of shit like this.
>You just posted more made up bullshit which isn't true. Why bother addressing it? You'll just keep going and going
what made up bs, exactly?
Its you who said writing windows xp application in windows 10 is very easy
It is also you who concluded that writing windows xp apps has its blockers and its not as hard as android/ios
If anything, you are the one who has proven to be inconsistent here. You started from ignoring the original point about running XP on a VM, and concluded with hatred towards indians and me in particular lmao. Keep on going and coping, its still better than leaving the thread to die
>>106321212
>you heavily rely on some shitty modern threadpool implementation
yeah, that's what anon did and told me that there will be no win32api compatibility issues when writing windows xp app on windows 10/11 when in truth, anon barely used win32api himself s_m_h desu
>msvc lacks undefined behavior sanitizer
and linux lacks a good debugger
>>106321212
So many triangles in here, where do I begin?
I seen this one, I'm 'bout to go in
Then she said, I'm here with my friends
She got me thinking... and that's when I said
Where them triangles at, girls at?
Where them triangles at, girls at?
Where them triangles at, girls at?
So go get them, we can all be friends