>>42743108
ponkbro here's the thing
I argued back and forth with u during the original "true waifufag" argument and i could tell from that argument that you're a good guy and probably a genuine waifu fag but the way you argue is so confusing that it makes it seem like your a retard who is pushing out paragraphs that mean nothing which anons just assume means your defending unfaithful waifufags

you REALLY need to keep it dead simple with simple definitions, again, i really think you're a cool guy but you're really spergy to the point arguing with you is confusing
you NEED strict definitions to work with, you argue almost entirely on emotions which provides no substance you need to be very explicit and strict with your definitions and actually type out the definition of a waifu fag in order to make people see ur not fully retarded
just type it out, make it simple, and dont do giant text walls and then people will get your point
hoping the best for you ponkerbro