>>106312377
Perhaps a consequence of 4o's implementation, instead of setting separate limits for each model (way too complicated~) they might have implemented an overall lower limit? It's likely that 4o is more expensive to run. As usual the solution is simple and it takes something like 5-10 minutes, make more accounts. Anyway I think failed gens always counted towards the hidden limit.
>>106312381
Back from vacation (real or otherwise)? This place was getting even deader-er without you. I'm hoping everything is fine/normal.