4 results for "39a366e125df67c8e4cd0f1db0d067f4"
my "takeaway" from Nietzsche is that "values" work as some sort of Rubik's cube; literally a "puzzle" to be solved...
also before i was thinking of the notion of "microcosm" as opposed to "little world" (this came out as a side tangent diverging from a mental reflection on feminism as "thief in daylight", its "organized crime" nature, e. g. the "powers that be" work on the "Destruction" of sexual dynamics, and once the working is working, feminists (agents, wittingly or unwittingly) of such power declare the "falsehood" (or more precisely "ontological vacuity") of such dynamics and declare the logical necessity of their "Destruction" via hijacking of the communicative "machines" that make up this world (this is what they "understand" ("work with") very well; the nature of the "Empire" (think for yourself: an empire, like "intentional consciousness" is always "transitive" i.e. "of something", "Empire of war", "Empire of finance" etc. we live in the "Empire of Fiction" declared by the "work" of "fiat money" the material "reification" of the "Enlightenment" working)), they are not "hunters" but "trappers" and conservatives fundamentally do not understand this fact, that's why they always lose like Scooby Doo villains... the "trick" of feminism is the false "diagnosis" of "patriarchal society" which in the West Anno Domini MMXXV simply does not exist! i say this for a myriad reasons, such as "patriarchy" being a "tool" of the anthropological "organon" that would be here simply misused, and the fact that an "actually existing patriarchy" would not simply be even "theoretizable" by feminism, i.e. "vulnerable to it just for the same reason that there could simply not be feminism under its vigilant gaze! an "actually existing patriarchy" being a "steelMANned" revision of the feminist "organon" wherein it refers to a society where the "dominant value" could be "logically reduced" to the "matheme" "male > female" would make feminism not a "repressed struggle" in a "dialectic" (i.e. "somewhat open system") but "ontologically null" in a "certainly closed system", i.e. in a state of "impossible being" result of "pre-Destruction" ("Destruction being a "closure" of a complex "system of values" that decides its "becoming within its being", its limits and possibilities, in real life often a result of a"magical working" that is incredibly difficult to perform (as a "live system" is hard to theorize in the first place for many reasons i won't explain, and so the "work" is fundamentally blind) and has been the object of desire and "reason d'etre" of occult collectives), which should only highlight the "mafia" almost "anthropocultural" (like "agricultural") nature of the whole enterprise)...
>>127623495
Hello again, sir!
>>106233626
good to see you again
>>23095252
noice