Look into the “double blind” systems theory tactic coined by Gregory Bateson in the 1950s. I am 100% certain this is Nick’s tactic and it’s entirely engineered and intentional.

> be Nick
>drop two takes that contradict each other
>audience brain.exe has stopped working
can’t pick a side without betraying the “movement”
>feel cognitive dissonance building
followers cope by waiting for Nick to explain it later
>he swoops back in with smug little smirk, “see? I told you”
>everyone claps like seals because daddy resolved the paradox

It’s basically weaponized contradiction.
>Creates chaos spreads virally.
>Traps his base in dependency they can’t self-resolve.
>He holds the “keys” to interpret his own contradictions.

Bateson wrote about it in systems theory, Fuentes just turned it into a grift-engine.

https://x.com/curbstompman/status/1964075508569882794?s=46

>>515024269
Look into the “double blind” systems theory tactic coined by Gregory Bateson in the 1950s. I am 100% certain this is Nick’s tactic and it’s entirely engineered and intentional.

> be Nick
>drop two takes that contradict each other
>audience brain.exe has stopped working
can’t pick a side without betraying the “movement”
>feel cognitive dissonance building
followers cope by waiting for Nick to explain it later
>he swoops back in with smug little smirk, “see? I told you”
>everyone claps like seals because daddy resolved the paradox

It’s basically weaponized contradiction.
>Creates chaos spreads virally.
>Traps his base in dependency they can’t self-resolve.
>He holds the “keys” to interpret his own contradictions.

Bateson wrote about it in systems theory, Fuentes just turned it into a grift-engine.

https://x.com/curbstompman/status/1964075508569882794?s=46