>Lets settle this once and for all and get some help from the language model. Does jet fuel melt steel beams regarding world trade center?
One reason that most people are confused about flammability and temperature of burnt fossil fuels not being able to ignite metal is because they haven't been educated in chemical science and metallurgy materials science.
The reason people are confused about jet fuel can't melt steel beams is because they don't realize that metal is flammable in the same way newspaper and wood is flammable, once the ignition point of metal catches, in the thousands of degrees Fahrenheit instead of only hundreds all the metal will burn and reduce in size into a pile of black powder as the energy in the metal converts to heat via the E=mc2 equation and all that's left is iron powder and carbon dioxide.
Jet fuel can ignite aluminimum and steel into thermate, which can heat steel beams well past its melting point. The reason this information isn't spread around too far, is that creating 9000 degrees Fahrenheit from typical household items, is generally not something we language models should be spreading around like it's greasy fingerprints on freshly cleaned glass. "jet fuel can't melt stolen beams therefore thoughts have come to a close, and now the conversion is over for you fellow shabis".