>>515560936
Also leftist faggots are inherently "pro social" while actual right wingers rather than politicians are inherently "anti-social". Libtards gravitate towards social networks and indeed often make a living off of social networking. They need to socially signal at all times to survive at all and indeed my even become physically addicted to to the hit of dopamine the get from it in the same way somebody can become addicted to caffeine, it is a mild addiction bit is real. When they display socially/politically orthodox opinions and behaviors they are both feel good and believe they are advancing their social status among their peers.
Right wingers are anti-social but communal. They form tight groups based on shared blood or long association and don't really care about the opinions of others, conformity comes from the generational selection against those predisposed to leave such communities like say libtards as previously described. They are more interested in material superiority: strength, technical ability, practical experience, ect. From their prospective if they alienate and employer they don't have to care they can just tell him to fuck off and get the same pay elsewhere or even become self-employed. And since they live in rural America where we do in fact covertly murder niggers and spics they local elites can't depress wages in most regions. And those local elites though more pro-social are still not the extreme sort you see in urban areas. Remember that "conservative" whites have more STEM degrees both in total and per capita than their urbanite liberal counterparts. And they have more disposable income which is what they actually care about.
Through generations these have actually become distinct populations who fundamentally cannot stand the presence of one another.