>>41434988
>but the book itself is poorly written and explained.
Here's a random excerpt. I literally just opened a random page. What's so hard to get? Simple, secular language, direct message without beating around the bush ("everything is possible, go for it"), real world analogies that ties up explanations in a simple manner, and everything is traced back to "One-Thing", to WHO you are, to the mechanical facts. So again, elaborate, WHY you think is "poorly written and explained"?

>I actually think it works better on dumb or impressionable people because it really does suck
If i am so dumb or impressionable then why i didn't stick to the new ager sweet talking book deal and has to listen to John to actually verify for myself that, as a matter of fact, I AM GOD? No, i may be dumb, but i also don't lack common sense, i'm more "street smart" than anything. UL is about WHO, as you're god, that means that whatever you imagine, you can do also, as your imagination is the substance of reality itself, the amount of facts you have taken for granted so far: Acting on lesser identity is the reason why we're having this conversation in the first place. Also, /one/ did A FUCKING HELL OF A JOB to offer the UL alternative to get across the same lesson, and also, to understand UL while using TG and the others contributions as a clarification. Btw, read read read read all you want, you won't go far until you actually go for it. Get a worldview. Do things in your own volition. That's what i suggest.