So let's continue that discussion:
>sumeru revenue $1,076,14
>fontaine revenue $647.968
>natlan revenue... $275,530
You can clearly see that Natlan had a 57.47% loss in revenue when compared to Fontaine, and a scary 74.6% loss when compared to Sumeru. Why did Natlan, but specially Mavuika flop so much, is there any particular reason?

>>545317416
>ignoring the fact that we had many examples of reruns doing well
How about this one?
>>545317435
>NOOO IT DOESN'T COUNT
I'm sorry that your bike flopped (not really).

>>545189456
>>545189590
How so? The revenue chart shows that Natlan instead of keeping it steady or recouping any losses, instead managed to lose even more revenue. 57% to be exact, that's more than half. That's the biggest flop genshin has ever seen.

>>545059829
Well you seem to be getting upset, how about you calm down and then answer my proposed question?
See this graph? It's shows natlan flopping, what do you think of that? If you need directions, look at the bottom, that's where floptan's revenue is.

>40% drop in revenue in natlan
>FORTY
>PER
>SCENT
DAWEI HAVE MERCY UPON OUR SOVLS

Flopping is the greatest marketing strategy of all time according to natlan defenders.
It only works for natlan though, doesn't count for any other region because they didn't flop as hard as natlan.
This, i've learned.

Why people refuse to explain this drop in 40% revenue in natlan? I just can never get an explanation for some reason.