>>514753690
Some have claimed a comprehensive list of the names in grand jury files or prior lawsuits would include Trump. Its ridiculous to make that claim given the profile of Trump in 2016 and 2024.
If there was any risk to Trump, the Clinton campaign would have exploited that vulnerability during the height of the MeToo movement in 2016. Even without Clinton, the Harris campaign would have used that narrative in 2024. Neither political opposition effort ever engaged in such a claim.

The Occam’s Razor review of the current state of Epstein victims’ status, is one that points toward extortion. The victims having previously signed agreements, would be at legal risk to violate their various NDAs. However, for the purposes of structuring a political narrative, there are likely revenue sources willing to fund an ongoing victim narrative.

The lawyers representing the victims at the press conference are likely compensated by the same entities who fund large domestic political operations. The “Republicans” who align with the intention of the efforts, seem to hold a commonality with the same financial interests behind former Republican candidate Ron DeSantis.

The victims now seem more akin to political operatives looking for some kind of secondary payday by maintaining a story they are not legally permitted to advance in specific ways.

The victim group continually says they will not name the people to whom they were trafficked, which is strange considering the high visibility of their performance and their obvious demand to release grand jury names that could be settled by their own statements releasing names. Additionally, their claims of imminent fear do not resonate truthfully against the backdrop of their quite happy presentation.
The DC event seems like a leverage game of sorts, with some financial benefit as the goal for the victims. For the DC politicians a construct to position themselves for some electoral benefit. Rather unseemly.