>>104148531
>you do know you can penetrate a woman va-gi-na from behind, not needing to go through the anus, when she's on all fours, right?
yes? that's literally what I was getting out
you were making it sound like you were confused about what the difference between having a condom and not would be regarding doggystyle because it's 'from behind' as if this would negate the need for a condom i.e you thought it was anal
women can literally still get pregnant from doggystyle, obviously, hence why using a condom for it would become the normfor casual sex and they'd invent a term for not using one while doing doggystyle i.e. rawdogging - doing doggy raw
>>104148572
if I attach a Saba in the relevant position, would it be more acceptable?