>>18140108
>Sales figures aren't available. 10 million copies of an unofficial Arabic translation were downloaded,
That’s a fucking lot.
>this is not the same as being read or believed.
10 million Arabs risked literal death or imprisonment so that they could read the musings of an edgy Reddit atheist. That’s pretty fucking significant.
>Considering there are 371 million people in the area, a mere 2% downloaded the ebook.
If 2% of people were such edgelord atheists that they risked prison to read fucking Richard Dawkins, then how many more are just quiet atheists trying to live out their lives in a country that will kill them for expressing doubts?
>GREAT SUCCESS.
Yes, literally.
4chan Search
2 results for "3dfb58df85346e42b7c1e58bc8364c9e"
>>17860036
>Footbinding was exclusively a female affair, anon.
>Done by mothers/grandmothers to their daughters/nieces. Men were not allowed in, men had absolutely no say in it.
>Their only input was that they kicked off the female arms race when the higher society agreed that smaller feet > bigger feet.
You literally refuted your own point, retard. Footbinding started because of social pressure from men (who set the rules and norms). It doesn’t matter who actually performed it, because it was an institution facilitated and expected by men. It’s not like men were repulsed by footbinding. It’s what they wanted, and they only selected for the women that were footbound the best. Men set the rules in patriarchal society.
Conversely, women don’t say they prefer circumcised men anywhere except maybe the USA and other regions where it’s common. Such women have probably never even had sex with an unmutilated man. No woman in Europe says they prefer cut men. They either have no opinion or think it’s weird that Americans do that.
>Footbinding was exclusively a female affair, anon.
>Done by mothers/grandmothers to their daughters/nieces. Men were not allowed in, men had absolutely no say in it.
>Their only input was that they kicked off the female arms race when the higher society agreed that smaller feet > bigger feet.
You literally refuted your own point, retard. Footbinding started because of social pressure from men (who set the rules and norms). It doesn’t matter who actually performed it, because it was an institution facilitated and expected by men. It’s not like men were repulsed by footbinding. It’s what they wanted, and they only selected for the women that were footbound the best. Men set the rules in patriarchal society.
Conversely, women don’t say they prefer circumcised men anywhere except maybe the USA and other regions where it’s common. Such women have probably never even had sex with an unmutilated man. No woman in Europe says they prefer cut men. They either have no opinion or think it’s weird that Americans do that.