>>514796232
Sounds interesting, however I'd be afraid that it gets its own problems wrong.
Because It doesn't actually know physics, you can only guarantee the problems and their solutions are actually correct if it basically copied the problems word by word from one of the textbooks it has in its learning database.
If you ask AI to actually create something new, especially in complicated fields, it will sometimes make really retarded obvious mistakes.
e.g. here it was retarded when I wanted it to combine several different graphs into a single diagramm, to show me all the different plasma regimes and equivalence lines etc.
and it just... forgot half of them and made other errors, e.g.
1) the E_F in the last line should be an E_rel,
2) thats the relativity vs thermal regime, thats a horizontal line, the corresponding vertical should be E_F = E_therm denoting the relativ. degernerate regime.
3) it totally forgot the E_coulomb = E_therm diagonal, which seperates an important condition for all ideal plasma
And I had to ask it multiple times to correct those errors and it always made a different mistake.
Like easy to spot, especially 1) since its literally just a few lines above where it correctly defined the fermi energy E_F, even an elementary school student would spot there's something wrong, but AI somehow got confused because it doesn't actually understand physics, it just generates words based on what it thinks the next word/sentence should be given its training data

>>514796786
>oh no, someone who has read and hopefully understood one or two physics textbooks on the topic (which is what you could at maximum realistically expect from a human university student) asks the LLM that has read ALL THE textbooks if there are e.g. more commonly used examples and different ways of describing the same concept over the hundreds of textbooks it has read that I havent mentioned yet, how horrible, I'm sure that will make that student understand the topic less instead of more.