>>17980034
>There is no mention in the
All religious texts <2000 A.D. have exceeded their expiration date versus the exponential rate of expansion of consciousness. The modern form of a religion manifests within the continual debate and conversation amongst the prime sentients of a population, as their thoughtforms themselves advance far too quickly for any static text to remain relevant long enough to warrant the creation of any new texts that might govern and supplant the ancient ones. This is the strength that atheists and agnostics continue to fail to perceive - there is no true achilles heel to be found in criticizing history: the true religion has always been a living, breathing, evolving thing, the infinity of it only barely capable of being captured within any text.

Animals can take the steps needed to qualify for vectorization towards the plane of heaven: heaven is so potent a thing that it is set up in a way to catch any soul relevant to its existence, so it would be a betrayal of its very substance to neglect any entity that could possess the requisite honor to enter it. All sufficiently benevolent and sentient beings will enter. How could the opposite ever be argued? As their intellect increases, generation by generation, and the inevitable divergence between good and evil actions throughout a lifespan manifests within them, within yet another species, it becomes clear that classification and organization within the grand system of God is required. Once the minimum level of neuronal density is reached to maintain contemplation of ones own existence, and self observation is maintained throughout that beings lifespan, can you truly say you would believe a God to be so cruel to abandon such a new being? A good one would not. So long as something is good and capable of maintaining its ego throughout multiple lifespans, it will be welcomed past its first trials of life. Anything less would be an unworthy doppelganger of true Heaven.