Subvenciones y premios
• Investigador Principal, Subvención R01 de NIH/NIAAA: “Entornos de alcohol en vecindarios y disparidades en salud” ($1.2M, 2015–2020)
• Coinvestigador, Acuerdo Cooperativo de CDC: “Intervenciones espaciales para la prevención de enfermedades infecciosas” ($800K, 2018–2023)
• Premio al Investigador Docente Sobresaliente, Escuela de Salud Pública de la Universidad de Tulane, 2008
Afiliaciones profesionales y servicios
• Miembro, Asociación Estadounidense de Salud Pública (APHA), Sección de Epidemiología
• Miembro, Sociedad para la Investigación Epidemiológica (SER)
• Revisor, Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research y Journal of Urban Health (2010–Presente)
• Consejo Asesor, Alianza de Políticas de Alcohol de Louisiana (2012–Presente)
Habilidades
• Software estadístico: SAS, R, ArcGIS (análisis espacial)
• Métodos de investigación: Modelado multinivel, SIG, estudios de cohortes longitudinales
• Idiomas: Inglés (nativo), Español (conversacional)
Referencias
Disponibles bajo solicitud.
4chan Search
13 results for "40bf16e943fb4d239f17a7d77b2348c2"
Countering Blake: The Mask as Rational Cage
To counter Blake, one must confront how the death mask embodies the very materialism he abhorred. Blake lambasted Newtonian science and Lockean empiricism as soul-killers, calling them the “Urizenic” forces that “single out” imagination into dull routine (Jerusalem). Phrenology, prevalent in 1820s London, reduced the human spirit to measurable bumps on the skull—a pseudoscience Blake would have scorned as idolatrous, chaining the infinite to the finite. The mask, born of this era, objectifies him: a lifeless replica for collectors or analysts, stripping away the dynamic visions of ghosts, fleas, and ancient prophets that defined his life. It “counters” his radical theology by preserving only the shell, mocking his cry in The Everlasting Gospel: “This Life’s dim windows of the soul / Distorts the Heavens from pole to pole.” In death, Blake becomes a specimen, his contraries flattened into plaster— a grim irony for the man who etched “Eternity is in love with the productions of time.”
When anons say: “remember: you’re here forever”
Echoes a seeming belief in immortality but then just logs off.
To counter Blake, one must confront how the death mask embodies the very materialism he abhorred. Blake lambasted Newtonian science and Lockean empiricism as soul-killers, calling them the “Urizenic” forces that “single out” imagination into dull routine (Jerusalem). Phrenology, prevalent in 1820s London, reduced the human spirit to measurable bumps on the skull—a pseudoscience Blake would have scorned as idolatrous, chaining the infinite to the finite. The mask, born of this era, objectifies him: a lifeless replica for collectors or analysts, stripping away the dynamic visions of ghosts, fleas, and ancient prophets that defined his life. It “counters” his radical theology by preserving only the shell, mocking his cry in The Everlasting Gospel: “This Life’s dim windows of the soul / Distorts the Heavens from pole to pole.” In death, Blake becomes a specimen, his contraries flattened into plaster— a grim irony for the man who etched “Eternity is in love with the productions of time.”
When anons say: “remember: you’re here forever”
Echoes a seeming belief in immortality but then just logs off.
>1999 - 2000: Bill Clinton repeals Glass-Steagall and immediately Jeffrey Epstein founds a new company with the help of Bear Stearns (who owned 40%) called Liquid Funding a company that specializes in Callateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) that had just become recently legal with the repeal of Glass-Steagall. CDO’s would later go on to become the cause of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.
>2003: Jeffrey Epstein initiates a sale of a Hedge Fund owned by Bear Stearns known as “Highbridge Capital” to JP Morgan and Epstein is paid $15 Million (likely much more off the books) for “Advice”
>2005: First victim comes forward who alleges her 14 year old step-daughter was paid $300 to “strip and massage” Jeffrey Epstein. This eventually escalates into a full investigation by the FBI in 2006.
>2006: One month after the federal investigation began into Jeffrey Epstein he invests 57 Million dollars into a Hedge Fund owned by Bear Stearns that focused on CDO’s. In July of 2006 Alexander Acosta (Future Secretary of Labor under Donald Trumps first term) with the help of Alan Dershowitz (Trump Impeachment Lawyer in 2020) Jeffrey Epstein negotiates a sweetheart Plea Deal and a “Non-Prosecution Agreement”, the FBI investigation is dropped, and all Epstein has to do is register as a Sex Offender.
>2007: On April 18th, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein pulls out 57 Million that he had invested the Bear Stearns Hedge Fund the year prior. At the time, the fund had a leverage ratio of 17:1, which meant for every dollar invested at that hedge fund there were 17 dollars worth of debt, Epsteins 57 million would have been the equivalent of pulling out over $1 BILLION from the CDO market which was about to burst; this resulted in the collapse of the fund and the collapse of Bear Stearns itself only a few weeks later.
>2003: Jeffrey Epstein initiates a sale of a Hedge Fund owned by Bear Stearns known as “Highbridge Capital” to JP Morgan and Epstein is paid $15 Million (likely much more off the books) for “Advice”
>2005: First victim comes forward who alleges her 14 year old step-daughter was paid $300 to “strip and massage” Jeffrey Epstein. This eventually escalates into a full investigation by the FBI in 2006.
>2006: One month after the federal investigation began into Jeffrey Epstein he invests 57 Million dollars into a Hedge Fund owned by Bear Stearns that focused on CDO’s. In July of 2006 Alexander Acosta (Future Secretary of Labor under Donald Trumps first term) with the help of Alan Dershowitz (Trump Impeachment Lawyer in 2020) Jeffrey Epstein negotiates a sweetheart Plea Deal and a “Non-Prosecution Agreement”, the FBI investigation is dropped, and all Epstein has to do is register as a Sex Offender.
>2007: On April 18th, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein pulls out 57 Million that he had invested the Bear Stearns Hedge Fund the year prior. At the time, the fund had a leverage ratio of 17:1, which meant for every dollar invested at that hedge fund there were 17 dollars worth of debt, Epsteins 57 million would have been the equivalent of pulling out over $1 BILLION from the CDO market which was about to burst; this resulted in the collapse of the fund and the collapse of Bear Stearns itself only a few weeks later.
>>515536470
I’m switching to the blue team because Manlets like Messi style on you bitches and I don’t want to go out like Carlie Kirk. Also I hung out with MS 13 last night and it turns out rhat some are actually good Christians. TKD denied.
Checked: plot twist: we’re ALL the Nazi’s but just disagree with economic policies and wear different brands of clothing.
I’m switching to the blue team because Manlets like Messi style on you bitches and I don’t want to go out like Carlie Kirk. Also I hung out with MS 13 last night and it turns out rhat some are actually good Christians. TKD denied.
Checked: plot twist: we’re ALL the Nazi’s but just disagree with economic policies and wear different brands of clothing.
Timeline Cont.
>US Virgin Islands AG files suit against JPMORGANCHASE on December 27th
>December 27th (around 11 PM same night) Joe Biden becomes the first sitting president to visit the USVI since 1948
>December 31st, 2022 it is announced in the local paper that the USVI AG has been fired
> January 2, 2023 Virgin Islands Attorney General, Denise George Loses Her Job Days After Suing JPMorgan Chase in Connection with the Jeffrey Epstein Probe
>USVI Governor Albert Bryan never gives a reason for her termination and STILL has not given a reason for her termination
>March 9th, 2023 JPMORGAN sues Jes Staley
>June 11th, 2023 months later it begins to be mentioned in newspapers and online articles that JPMORGAN settles with Epstein Victims for 300 million shekels
>June 16th, 2023 , Judge Jed S. Rekoff orders that Jamie Dimon doesn't have to speak in court
>June 20th, 2023 articles discussing "Project Jeep" begin to be posted online after documents are unsealed on court listener. These documents mostly consist of emails & text messages between Staley and Epstein >documents unsealed by the USVI request (JPMORGAN & USVI working together to throw Jes Staley under the bus)
>June 22nd, 2023 JP Morgan "Accidentally" loses 47 million emails and text messages. Is fined an insultingly low 4 million shekels
>June 22nd, 2023 Jes Staley in act of defiance asks judge for more documents from JPMORGAN to be unsealed, documents that implicate Jamie Dimon
>June 25th, 2023 JPMORGAN Board Member (Jim Crown) has brake lines cut on racetrack and dies
>July 18th, 2023 USVI AGs office files similar request for the same documents Jes Staley is demanding access to.
>US Virgin Islands AG files suit against JPMORGANCHASE on December 27th
>December 27th (around 11 PM same night) Joe Biden becomes the first sitting president to visit the USVI since 1948
>December 31st, 2022 it is announced in the local paper that the USVI AG has been fired
> January 2, 2023 Virgin Islands Attorney General, Denise George Loses Her Job Days After Suing JPMorgan Chase in Connection with the Jeffrey Epstein Probe
>USVI Governor Albert Bryan never gives a reason for her termination and STILL has not given a reason for her termination
>March 9th, 2023 JPMORGAN sues Jes Staley
>June 11th, 2023 months later it begins to be mentioned in newspapers and online articles that JPMORGAN settles with Epstein Victims for 300 million shekels
>June 16th, 2023 , Judge Jed S. Rekoff orders that Jamie Dimon doesn't have to speak in court
>June 20th, 2023 articles discussing "Project Jeep" begin to be posted online after documents are unsealed on court listener. These documents mostly consist of emails & text messages between Staley and Epstein >documents unsealed by the USVI request (JPMORGAN & USVI working together to throw Jes Staley under the bus)
>June 22nd, 2023 JP Morgan "Accidentally" loses 47 million emails and text messages. Is fined an insultingly low 4 million shekels
>June 22nd, 2023 Jes Staley in act of defiance asks judge for more documents from JPMORGAN to be unsealed, documents that implicate Jamie Dimon
>June 25th, 2023 JPMORGAN Board Member (Jim Crown) has brake lines cut on racetrack and dies
>July 18th, 2023 USVI AGs office files similar request for the same documents Jes Staley is demanding access to.
>>514170589
4. Addressing Weaknesses and Logical Coherence
Critics argue the theory lacks direct proof, but intelligence operations are designed for deniability—assets like Epstein operate through cutouts (e.g., Wexner, Barak). Epstein’s 2019 “suicide” (with broken neck bones and sleeping guards) mirrors Robert Maxwell’s suspicious death, suggesting cleanup to protect handlers. Recent DOJ releases (e.g., no “client list” found) could be selective, as agencies control disclosures. The theory’s strength lies in its explanatory power: it accounts for Epstein’s wealth, access, leniency, and elite network better than alternatives like him being a lone predator.
In this steel-manned view, Epstein was a joint Mossad-CIA asset, his trafficking ring a tool for global blackmail to manipulate power structures. This isn’t fringe; it’s supported by investigative journalism (e.g., Whitney Webb’s “One Nation Under Blackmail”) and aligns with historical precedents like the CIA’s MKUltra or Mossad’s use of kompromat. If true, it exposes how intelligence agencies undermine democracy through moral corruption.
4. Addressing Weaknesses and Logical Coherence
Critics argue the theory lacks direct proof, but intelligence operations are designed for deniability—assets like Epstein operate through cutouts (e.g., Wexner, Barak). Epstein’s 2019 “suicide” (with broken neck bones and sleeping guards) mirrors Robert Maxwell’s suspicious death, suggesting cleanup to protect handlers. Recent DOJ releases (e.g., no “client list” found) could be selective, as agencies control disclosures. The theory’s strength lies in its explanatory power: it accounts for Epstein’s wealth, access, leniency, and elite network better than alternatives like him being a lone predator.
In this steel-manned view, Epstein was a joint Mossad-CIA asset, his trafficking ring a tool for global blackmail to manipulate power structures. This isn’t fringe; it’s supported by investigative journalism (e.g., Whitney Webb’s “One Nation Under Blackmail”) and aligns with historical precedents like the CIA’s MKUltra or Mossad’s use of kompromat. If true, it exposes how intelligence agencies undermine democracy through moral corruption.
>>514070115
Epstein Court Documents (2016)
Epstein’s Explicit Blackmail Admissions and Tactics:
• In a 2016 email exchange (pp. 800–850), Epstein references using “information” to “protect” himself, hinting at kompromat (Russian term for compromising material). Giuffre’s testimony (pp. 100–150) claims Epstein said he could “ruin” people by releasing videos, using it to coerce compliance from both victims and elites.
• A standout anecdote: Sjoberg recounts Epstein joking about Bill Clinton liking “them young,” followed by a discussion of photos/videos as “insurance” (pp. 200–250). Another victim, “Jane Doe” (pseudonym, pp. 400–450), alleges Epstein pressured her to recruit girls by threatening to expose her own filmed encounters.
• Connections to intelligence: References to Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine’s father, a suspected Mossad agent) and Epstein’s associate Ehud Barak (former Israeli PM) fuel speculation of state-level blackmail (pp. 1000–1100), though unproven. Epstein’s brother Mark testified (pp. 1200–1250) that Jeffrey collected “trophies” like photos of nude elites.
Epstein Court Documents (2016)
Epstein’s Explicit Blackmail Admissions and Tactics:
• In a 2016 email exchange (pp. 800–850), Epstein references using “information” to “protect” himself, hinting at kompromat (Russian term for compromising material). Giuffre’s testimony (pp. 100–150) claims Epstein said he could “ruin” people by releasing videos, using it to coerce compliance from both victims and elites.
• A standout anecdote: Sjoberg recounts Epstein joking about Bill Clinton liking “them young,” followed by a discussion of photos/videos as “insurance” (pp. 200–250). Another victim, “Jane Doe” (pseudonym, pp. 400–450), alleges Epstein pressured her to recruit girls by threatening to expose her own filmed encounters.
• Connections to intelligence: References to Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine’s father, a suspected Mossad agent) and Epstein’s associate Ehud Barak (former Israeli PM) fuel speculation of state-level blackmail (pp. 1000–1100), though unproven. Epstein’s brother Mark testified (pp. 1200–1250) that Jeffrey collected “trophies” like photos of nude elites.
Epstein Court Documents (2016)
Epstein’s Explicit Blackmail Admissions and Tactics:
• In a 2016 email exchange (pp. 800–850), Epstein references using “information” to “protect” himself, hinting at kompromat (Russian term for compromising material). Giuffre’s testimony (pp. 100–150) claims Epstein said he could “ruin” people by releasing videos, using it to coerce compliance from both victims and elites.
• A standout anecdote: Sjoberg recounts Epstein joking about Bill Clinton liking “them young,” followed by a discussion of photos/videos as “insurance” (pp. 200–250). Another victim, “Jane Doe” (pseudonym, pp. 400–450), alleges Epstein pressured her to recruit girls by threatening to expose her own filmed encounters.
• Connections to intelligence: References to Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine’s father, a suspected Mossad agent) and Epstein’s associate Ehud Barak (former Israeli PM) fuel speculation of state-level blackmail (pp. 1000–1100), though unproven. Epstein’s brother Mark testified (pp. 1200–1250) that Jeffrey collected “trophies” like photos of nude elites.
Epstein’s Explicit Blackmail Admissions and Tactics:
• In a 2016 email exchange (pp. 800–850), Epstein references using “information” to “protect” himself, hinting at kompromat (Russian term for compromising material). Giuffre’s testimony (pp. 100–150) claims Epstein said he could “ruin” people by releasing videos, using it to coerce compliance from both victims and elites.
• A standout anecdote: Sjoberg recounts Epstein joking about Bill Clinton liking “them young,” followed by a discussion of photos/videos as “insurance” (pp. 200–250). Another victim, “Jane Doe” (pseudonym, pp. 400–450), alleges Epstein pressured her to recruit girls by threatening to expose her own filmed encounters.
• Connections to intelligence: References to Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine’s father, a suspected Mossad agent) and Epstein’s associate Ehud Barak (former Israeli PM) fuel speculation of state-level blackmail (pp. 1000–1100), though unproven. Epstein’s brother Mark testified (pp. 1200–1250) that Jeffrey collected “trophies” like photos of nude elites.
>>513886319
Epstein Court Documents (2016)
Epstein’s Explicit Blackmail Admissions and Tactics:
• In a 2016 email exchange (pp. 800–850), Epstein references using “information” to “protect” himself, hinting at kompromat (Russian term for compromising material). Giuffre’s testimony (pp. 100–150) claims Epstein said he could “ruin” people by releasing videos, using it to coerce compliance from both victims and elites.
• A standout anecdote: Sjoberg recounts Epstein joking about Bill Clinton liking “them young,” followed by a discussion of photos/videos as “insurance” (pp. 200–250). Another victim, “Jane Doe” (pseudonym, pp. 400–450), alleges Epstein pressured her to recruit girls by threatening to expose her own filmed encounters.
• Connections to intelligence: References to Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine’s father, a suspected Mossad agent) and Epstein’s associate Ehud Barak (former Israeli PM) fuel speculation of state-level blackmail (pp. 1000–1100), though unproven. Epstein’s brother Mark testified (pp. 1200–1250) that Jeffrey collected “trophies” like photos of nude elites.
Epstein Court Documents (2016)
Epstein’s Explicit Blackmail Admissions and Tactics:
• In a 2016 email exchange (pp. 800–850), Epstein references using “information” to “protect” himself, hinting at kompromat (Russian term for compromising material). Giuffre’s testimony (pp. 100–150) claims Epstein said he could “ruin” people by releasing videos, using it to coerce compliance from both victims and elites.
• A standout anecdote: Sjoberg recounts Epstein joking about Bill Clinton liking “them young,” followed by a discussion of photos/videos as “insurance” (pp. 200–250). Another victim, “Jane Doe” (pseudonym, pp. 400–450), alleges Epstein pressured her to recruit girls by threatening to expose her own filmed encounters.
• Connections to intelligence: References to Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine’s father, a suspected Mossad agent) and Epstein’s associate Ehud Barak (former Israeli PM) fuel speculation of state-level blackmail (pp. 1000–1100), though unproven. Epstein’s brother Mark testified (pp. 1200–1250) that Jeffrey collected “trophies” like photos of nude elites.
Intelligence Connections and Protected Status
• Documents reference Epstein’s alleged ties to intelligence agencies, which some interpret as enabling a blackmail scheme. In one redacted memo (from around 2007–2011), former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta reportedly stated he was told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and to “leave it alone” during the non-prosecution agreement negotiations. This phrase appears in investigative notes and has been cited as suggesting Epstein’s operation was shielded, possibly for gathering intel or kompromat on influential figures.
• Epstein’s associations with figures like former CIA Director William Burns (mentioned in calendars, though not directly in these files) and Israeli intelligence (via Ehud Barak visits) add to theories of a broader network using sex trafficking for leverage.
• Documents reference Epstein’s alleged ties to intelligence agencies, which some interpret as enabling a blackmail scheme. In one redacted memo (from around 2007–2011), former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta reportedly stated he was told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and to “leave it alone” during the non-prosecution agreement negotiations. This phrase appears in investigative notes and has been cited as suggesting Epstein’s operation was shielded, possibly for gathering intel or kompromat on influential figures.
• Epstein’s associations with figures like former CIA Director William Burns (mentioned in calendars, though not directly in these files) and Israeli intelligence (via Ehud Barak visits) add to theories of a broader network using sex trafficking for leverage.
