>>938483578
> The statue, unveiled in 1914, features a bronze woman, crowned with olive leaves, standing on a 32-foot pedestal, and was designed to represent the American South. Some of the figures also on the statue include a Black woman depicted as “Mammy” holding what is said to be the child of a white officer, and an enslaved man following his owner to war.
Why would I have a problem with this monument??

>>938483627
>its democrats that supported slavery
Is that not true?? Was Lincoln not a Republican??

>Republicans have a shit fit because they're "destroying history"
Is it not true that removing a monument that's been in place for a century is destroying history?? Do the people who live in the area not have the right to voice their opinion on the issue?? Why do you call it a "shit fit" when the right has an opinion, but you don't call it a "shit fit" when the left forms a mob of vigilantes and vandalizes public property?

Do you think you're on the right side of this? Do you think you are capable of making a good argument here?

You're on the side that represent hatred. You're the bad guys. Look at pic-related. You. Are. A. Bad. Person.