4chan Search
14 results for "41d6b5a75785f01d2f1d2268836d3a23"
The side with more artillery or cavalry always wins. All WW2 spam is futile. All military history is futile.
---
VII. POST-QING & MODERN ERA (1911–Present)
When the Qing dynasty collapsed (1911), the Mongols restored independence and revived the title “Khan” in a spiritual and political sense.
Title Name Period Notes
Bogd Khan 1911–1924 (8th Jebtsundamba Khutuktu); head of state of independent Mongolia (1911–1921) and later theocratic monarch until his death in 1924.
— — — After 1924, the Mongolian People’s Republic was established; khanships abolished.
---
VIII. REGIONAL / SUCCESSOR KHANATES FROM THE MONGOL LEGACY
Even after the fall of the unified empire, several successor khanates traced descent or legitimacy from Genghis Khan’s lineage:
Region Khanate Period Notable Khans
Crimea Crimean Khanate 1441–1783 Hacı I Giray (founder), Devlet I Giray, Sahib I Giray.
Kazan Kazan Khanate 1438–1552 Ulugh Muhammad, Ibrahim, Safa Giray.
Astrakhan Astrakhan Khanate 1466–1556 Qasim I, Dervish Ali.
Siberia Siberian Khanate 1490s–1598 Kuchum Khan (last, defeated by Russians).
Bukhara Uzbek Khanates 1500s–1800s Claimed descent from Jochid branch.
Kazakh Khanate Kazakhstan 1465–1847 Kerei, Janibek, Ablai, Kenesary (last khan).
---
IX. SUMMARY TIMELINE (Condensed Overview)
Era Khanates / Dynasties Approx. Duration
Unified Mongol Empire Genghis Möngke 1206–1260
Yuan Dynasty (China) Kublai Toghon Temür 1260–1370
Ilkhanate (Persia) Hülegü Abu Sa’id 1256–1335
Golden Horde (Russia) Batu Tokhtamysh & beyond 1240s–1502
Chagatai Khanate (Central Asia) Chagatai Tarmashirin Moghulistan 1226–1680s
Northern Yuan (Mongolia) Biligtü Ligdan 1370–1634
Dzungar Khanate (Oirats) Khara Khula Amursana 1600–1757
Khalkha (Mongolia under Qing) 17th–19th c. Semi-autonomous princes
Bogd Khanate (Modern) 1911–1924 Last khan of Mongolia
---
VII. POST-QING & MODERN ERA (1911–Present)
When the Qing dynasty collapsed (1911), the Mongols restored independence and revived the title “Khan” in a spiritual and political sense.
Title Name Period Notes
Bogd Khan 1911–1924 (8th Jebtsundamba Khutuktu); head of state of independent Mongolia (1911–1921) and later theocratic monarch until his death in 1924.
— — — After 1924, the Mongolian People’s Republic was established; khanships abolished.
---
VIII. REGIONAL / SUCCESSOR KHANATES FROM THE MONGOL LEGACY
Even after the fall of the unified empire, several successor khanates traced descent or legitimacy from Genghis Khan’s lineage:
Region Khanate Period Notable Khans
Crimea Crimean Khanate 1441–1783 Hacı I Giray (founder), Devlet I Giray, Sahib I Giray.
Kazan Kazan Khanate 1438–1552 Ulugh Muhammad, Ibrahim, Safa Giray.
Astrakhan Astrakhan Khanate 1466–1556 Qasim I, Dervish Ali.
Siberia Siberian Khanate 1490s–1598 Kuchum Khan (last, defeated by Russians).
Bukhara Uzbek Khanates 1500s–1800s Claimed descent from Jochid branch.
Kazakh Khanate Kazakhstan 1465–1847 Kerei, Janibek, Ablai, Kenesary (last khan).
---
IX. SUMMARY TIMELINE (Condensed Overview)
Era Khanates / Dynasties Approx. Duration
Unified Mongol Empire Genghis Möngke 1206–1260
Yuan Dynasty (China) Kublai Toghon Temür 1260–1370
Ilkhanate (Persia) Hülegü Abu Sa’id 1256–1335
Golden Horde (Russia) Batu Tokhtamysh & beyond 1240s–1502
Chagatai Khanate (Central Asia) Chagatai Tarmashirin Moghulistan 1226–1680s
Northern Yuan (Mongolia) Biligtü Ligdan 1370–1634
Dzungar Khanate (Oirats) Khara Khula Amursana 1600–1757
Khalkha (Mongolia under Qing) 17th–19th c. Semi-autonomous princes
Bogd Khanate (Modern) 1911–1924 Last khan of Mongolia
---
>>18146869
Archery always develops in steppe. No steppe fails to develop archery.
>>18146866
I have answered your thread billions of times.
Archery always develops in steppe. No steppe fails to develop archery.
>>18146866
I have answered your thread billions of times.
Side with more artillery or cavalry always wins.
The gulf war is the only war ever fought that has actual, day by day aars. Before twitter or any online source. Capitalism is literally retards.
The side with more artillery or cavalry always wins. Find exceptions.
>>18088467
The side with more artillery or cavalry always wins.
>>18088431
Distinction of heavy vs light in NPC sources is about the weapons used vs archery.
The side with more artillery or cavalry always wins.
>>18088431
Distinction of heavy vs light in NPC sources is about the weapons used vs archery.
>>18082061
They actually wouldn't. At islawanda 100 primitives killed 1 British soldier.
Dozens of primitive vs one gun will win. But the gun also has many people behind it and logistically the gun is actually a lot of people.
Human power is 10kw and energy is $1 per mj so a thousand bullets is about a minute of human time, so about a million humans would be needed per shooter if they were efficient.
In reality it takes about a million bullets per kill because you need to keep the enemy away from your food.
In an attrition scenario the gun guy is firing at about a mile range to protect their supplies. 1% error at 1 mile vs a 1 meter target is about a thousand bullets per hit. If multiple hits per kill and also target is small then it could easily get toward 100,000 bullets per kill.
This means your effort to make bullets is pretty close to the effort for the infantry to run away and steal your food.
They actually wouldn't. At islawanda 100 primitives killed 1 British soldier.
Dozens of primitive vs one gun will win. But the gun also has many people behind it and logistically the gun is actually a lot of people.
Human power is 10kw and energy is $1 per mj so a thousand bullets is about a minute of human time, so about a million humans would be needed per shooter if they were efficient.
In reality it takes about a million bullets per kill because you need to keep the enemy away from your food.
In an attrition scenario the gun guy is firing at about a mile range to protect their supplies. 1% error at 1 mile vs a 1 meter target is about a thousand bullets per hit. If multiple hits per kill and also target is small then it could easily get toward 100,000 bullets per kill.
This means your effort to make bullets is pretty close to the effort for the infantry to run away and steal your food.
The side with more artillery or cavalry always wins.
>>18077523
No physical evidence for battle of stalingrad
No physical evidence for battle of stalingrad
>>18073107
Whole point of pikes is to just stick things in the ground and poke whoever is there. It's a childish "weapon system" and comparable to fortifications or something that is bypassed rather than directly attacked.
Point of pikes is to deny territory and useless as a mobile weapon. They would be engaged with other pikes, archers or other avoidant weapons.
Whole point of pikes is to just stick things in the ground and poke whoever is there. It's a childish "weapon system" and comparable to fortifications or something that is bypassed rather than directly attacked.
Point of pikes is to deny territory and useless as a mobile weapon. They would be engaged with other pikes, archers or other avoidant weapons.
The side with more artillery or cavalry always wins.
>>18066581
His is a retard board so it fixates on people dying and bureaucracy.
The charging into machine gun meme never happened. No physical evidence for battle of stalingrad.
WW1 was not about infantry and trenches. The first half of the war was mobile warfare. Into 1915 they still were not entrenched.
The marne is the one case the trench meme was an issue. In that instance it was still about artillery and fortifications. Nobody used infantry as the primary combat arm.
Also, there was quite a bit of use of armored trains which is usually ignored and the trains were the most mobile way to move artillery. Before tanks existed the trains were the best mobile firepower.
Then the entire second half of the war was ruled by tanks, artillery and aircraft and at no point did infantry matter.
But as for soldiers obviously Germans has it worse as their high command compeltely was taken over by rotschilds in the final months of the war, ordered retreat with overwhelming numerical advantage and then Jews completely holed the economy. Russia, same problem.
Best situation was America which had the bbc meme his is so obsessed with.
His is a retard board so it fixates on people dying and bureaucracy.
The charging into machine gun meme never happened. No physical evidence for battle of stalingrad.
WW1 was not about infantry and trenches. The first half of the war was mobile warfare. Into 1915 they still were not entrenched.
The marne is the one case the trench meme was an issue. In that instance it was still about artillery and fortifications. Nobody used infantry as the primary combat arm.
Also, there was quite a bit of use of armored trains which is usually ignored and the trains were the most mobile way to move artillery. Before tanks existed the trains were the best mobile firepower.
Then the entire second half of the war was ruled by tanks, artillery and aircraft and at no point did infantry matter.
But as for soldiers obviously Germans has it worse as their high command compeltely was taken over by rotschilds in the final months of the war, ordered retreat with overwhelming numerical advantage and then Jews completely holed the economy. Russia, same problem.
Best situation was America which had the bbc meme his is so obsessed with.
The side with more infantry or cavalry always wins.