>>1865592
What implications are they? Let's have a look shall we?
>Hasn't played it
Not an implication, a statement of fact based on the evidence provided. You stated that you found it, but couldn't get it to work. You're even basing the genre of the game off a "video by the dev", confirming no personal experience playing.
>Can't get it to work
Again, not an implication, same as above.
>Recommends it anyway
The closest thing to an 'implication', but still not one, given your post was in reply to the OP who was asking for recommendations. Also, logically, if it wasn't a recommendation then why the hell did you post about it at all?
>This conversation is over
I don't know what's wrong with you, frankly I pity you, you're clearly at least mildly retarded. Your choices are leave defeated, reply more to further highlight your mental deficiencies (not a winning strategy), or at best simply admit to being a dumbass and move on.
