>>103681283
The comparison make sense, because that "ratio" of engagement to viewership indicates there's something deeply wrong. We have examples of "normal" streamers.
That long haired flesh dude Charlie is live on youtube right now, has 5k CCV and 716 likes. And I guarantee his likes will never hit 100% of his viewership while that stream is live.
>churn-
Why the fuck would a Holo get more churn than supposedly one of the most popular flesh streamers getting free shilled by the algo? He's front page on the Live tab right now. He should get a lot MORE churn than any holo, not less, and certainly not FAR less.