>>42485490
>not taking in refugees violates their rights
is that really what the kooks are saying now?
>if a third world shithole is oppressing people, we have to invade them
um.. yes. yes we do. but it's never gays or women, it's always a minority ethnic/religious group. those countries don't HAVE gays.
>next quarter century rebuilding
well we wouldn't have to if we had any fucking competence
>everybody has their own path to follow
... no.. there is the american way, and that's it. If they want to have a working country, they can do things our way, or pay us for food.
I'm not sure what bizarre part of /pol/ you hang out in if you think the justification for war in the middle east is their mistreatment of women. the people who bawww about women are also the ones who defend arabs.
and very little of this is pony-related, varmint.
