>>538843125
I'm using meta 3.3 It seems to be the only one that consistently works on my setup. It does require some handholding though.
> that singular greeting being pretty much the only situation you'd ever encounter her in unless either you're already her ally or she had already tied you up and put you in a bag. Hmm, would those be good intros?
As my character suggests, there may be human collaborators/sympathizers to their cause. I tried to guide them into the snuggle session without forcing it, but I suppose it was in line with their character not to indulge in that activity impulsively.
>>538837449
I had a few different ways to tackle this card. For shits and giggles, I tried a caveman cadence and built my own language on the fly. I don't know if this is a particular fetish of yours, but I enjoy mixing languages and dealing with language barriers with bots, so it was fun to mess around with that aspect of the character. Sadly, I didn't get to explore this as much as I would have liked, as I detail in the following paragraph.
My scenario was very simple, very grug-brained. I felt it fit things nicely. My only problem is that I kinda wrote myself into a corner. The character I was portraying was too dumb to have a change of heart, and the end result was more rape or death. While satisfying as a carnal misadventure, it did little to tease my fancy. Perhaps this bot could have shone a little more with a more creative scenario? On a technical level, everything definition-wise seems alright.

Like the bunny card, I noticed the setting was inserted into the defs. I'm probably going to start doing that for my cards. Seems to be a viable trend. I give 5 unga bugnas out of 5.