>>520459012
>It won't because it is a good market so it will be copyrighted the hell out of it.
It will because I will make it so. Copyrighting sexbots is a fool's mistake, and making a soft-skinned uncanny 'sex doll with robotics shoved in' is an even bigger fool's errand.
You make a functional internal frame you can mount custom casings on, open source the frame and let anyone sell/make casings, cementing your design as the industry standard in the same manner that Arduino did to microcontrollers. Other people will value-add to your product for you, FOR FREE, because they want to sell their own waifu designs and wafiu add-on modifications using your platform.
>>520459338
Double retarded nigger monkey brainwashed by scifi.
>Hurr scifi told me only elite megarich playboy trillionaire like Tony Shart will have AI, muh Jarvis!
Meanwhile in reality, multiple cutting edge models are open source for any retard to run at home if they wish. Try and cope to me why it won't be the same for assembling a wife bot from printed parts and fairly basic motorised components. We have had precision robotics for decades, the only thing slowing down wife bots being out TODAY is the obsession changs have with making them walk *and* fitting them into the frame of a frail squishy biofoid.