>>514027934
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/farage-immigration-deportation-reform-law-b2813624.html
>The courts would probably block Nigel Farage’s attempts at mass deportation using British common law, even if he “unpicked Britain” from international human rights laws, former attorney general Dominic Grieve has warned.

>he pointed out that getting rid of international agreements the UK has signed up to would not necessarily mean that the courts would allow Mr Farage, if he became prime minister, to simply deport irregular migrants or foreign criminals.

>“This policy would require leaving the Refugee Convention, change your national domestic laws, which reflect the operation of the Refugee Convention, pull out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and give the government through primary legislation essentially full powers to remove aliens who are regarded as being undesirable from the United Kingdom,” he noted.

>But on what the courts might still do, he added: “You still can’t rule out that a court might – in the case of somebody where it was quite clear they were going to be deported, in circumstances where their lives would be seriously at risk in their home country – intervene to stop deportation under customary law or even the common law.”

>Top of these would be the collapse of the post-Brexit deal with the EU, which includes a provision that the UK must remain in the ECHR.

Oh no. Anyway.

That bottom paragraph I highlighted shows exactly why the government won't leave the ECHR. It's because the new EU deal after Brexit would be broken. That pretty much spells out that we never left the EU in the first place. Brussels was always banging on about economic alignment during the talks. Staying in the ECHR just proves we never truly left. That's why voting for Nigel is the only way to end this. because we know he means it when he says he wants to leave the EU.