>>82871969
>Nobody who is a KHHV says this, it's only sexhavers
So it's only people who know what they are talking about.
What should be done with this information in a reasonable way?
>Peter Scully, Pol Pot, and Albert Fish were also people
Which are not all the same indeed.
The point was, amongst other things, that simping is a fool's errand.
>From my experience they all just talk about Love Island and Crumbl Cookies
Those I filter out brutally early. But, because my circles of friends already are filtered, I don't have to run into the type often.
>Yes I have friends, although I haven't made new ones in nearly a decade. My social skills have atrophied.
At least. You don't actually need any presence on social media and such either. Any intelligent female won't give a shit.
You need friends though.
4chan Search
3 results for "454e5da1489683e3f6f3e75546d0f09b"
It's time for some self-esteem and self-preservation instincts.
If trans is a core part of you then you have to develop self-esteem about it.
If trans is a core part of you then you have to develop self-esteem about it.
/lgbt/ - Supreme Court's anti-trans ruling could be used to expand discrimination against women
Supreme Court's anti-trans ruling could be used to expand discrimination against women
https://alabamareflector.com/2025/07/09/many-medical-treatments-could-be-affected-by-supreme-court-transgender-ruling/
Tennessee’s law says the state has a “compelling interest in encouraging minors to appreciate their sex.”
Some legal and policy experts say the court’s reasoning in Skrmetti could allow states to enact further restrictions on abortion, contraception, in vitro fertilization or other health care, particularly sex-specific treatment, sidestepping previous protections.
Jules Gill-Peterson, an associate professor of transgender history at Johns Hopkins University, called the ruling “consequential.”
“The court has basically decreed a new form of legal and political vulnerability that did not exist before the Skrmetti case,” she said. ”Everyone has a sex. Everyone is now much more vulnerable to sex discrimination in this country, even if it hasn’t taken place yet.”
She added that women, especially, could see rollbacks.
“It will greatly advance people’s ability to discriminate against women,” she said. “This case really kind of now altered the legal landscape in a pretty significant way.”
Tennessee’s law says the state has a “compelling interest in encouraging minors to appreciate their sex.”
Some legal and policy experts say the court’s reasoning in Skrmetti could allow states to enact further restrictions on abortion, contraception, in vitro fertilization or other health care, particularly sex-specific treatment, sidestepping previous protections.
Jules Gill-Peterson, an associate professor of transgender history at Johns Hopkins University, called the ruling “consequential.”
“The court has basically decreed a new form of legal and political vulnerability that did not exist before the Skrmetti case,” she said. ”Everyone has a sex. Everyone is now much more vulnerable to sex discrimination in this country, even if it hasn’t taken place yet.”
She added that women, especially, could see rollbacks.
“It will greatly advance people’s ability to discriminate against women,” she said. “This case really kind of now altered the legal landscape in a pretty significant way.”