>>723963667
>Take software that absolutely can not fucking admit to being unsure or wrong about anything and if ever it lacks information it will just make up shit on the spot without informing you about it
>Tell it to do something important that requires double checking afterwards
A bad art asset with AI fuck ups will ultimately not fuck up anything, even if it shows your product is half assed dogshit (but cattle doesn't care about that and they demonstrated it way before AI became a thing). But why the fuck would you let it do ANYTHING that relates to the functionality of your project?
You just spend the same amount of time you'd actually take to do the thing, except now that time is spent on combing through something an AI made, which might be perfect or it might contain any error inside. Except it will always deliver you the results with full confidence so you're basically taking a full on gamble each time.

I love the future so much bros.
Every job being either manual labor or just eternally fixing AI's errors. All while old money is just looking down on this getting richer doing nothing until either we become a literal slave caste or the system collapses due to its sheer retardation.
>B-but I'll make my dream game and get rich!
No you won't.
Do you genuinely believe that when everyone has sophisticated tools to make whatever, you won't be competing with billions other shitskins like you trying to do the same? While having to compete with AI products made by massive corporations with shitton of advertising budget and sway?
Do you genuinely believe you can make ANYTHING groundbreaking enough to even have a chance at getting noticed amidst a flood of retards like you trying to do the same, when you didn't even bother trying to do anything or learn anything before the "press button to make thing" machine came along?