>>4474447
>Should I get a blob so I can never go home without every possible permutation of a shot, like a scammy wedding photographer, and compromise aesthetics and atmosphere so I can take every possible photo and maybe get something that simply isn't shit, and eventually devolve into barely taking my camera anywhere because its a huge blob
>Or should I use a decent prime like literally every notable artist before me and focus on the actual core of photography as an art form, which is how aesthetics and atmosphere contribute to the overall narrative
You know what, I think you should spend a grand and get the hideous compromised blob so someone can rob you of your camera that much sooner. Or better yet, leverage your newfound hate of carrying that blob around to become a terminally online dog-posting gearfag and make 90% of your photography test shots of your redditcore normie pet and random shit in your backyard.

or maybe you want more out of life? maybe it's time to take the leap

buy a proper blob for scamming newlyweds and leave it in a dry box when you're not scamming them, and do all your real photography on a film PNS

>>4474512
foveon and monochrome cameras were invented to scam megapixel autists and tech nerds. brotip: just resize your images to 70% and its the same thing.
>muh pixel level sharpness
most people never view more than 1920x1080 pixels at once
moderately spendy fucks never view more than 3840x2160 pixels at once
if you think pixels and sharpness matter you have been lied to