>>64083815
Fair point, let me do his apologetics however:
>Still better than the competition
He's still no Patton or even Macarthur of course
But blame Patton's driver and Truman on those, i modify my statement to Eisenhower's military policies
>>64083818
>As opposed to the state department/alphabet boys with control of nukes
and the army which is handheld by them to be ineffective when the strategic nukes actually do fly.
Also why should we spend trillions on a MIC when nukes are a thing that would defend the country better, for cheaper and with a direct double use in the energy sector?