>>519183200
I'll trade the 3rd amendment for a cheap government subsidized apartment. Soldiers can sleep in my living room if the want. That amendment was supposed to prevent mass surveillance but the 2nd amendment is the one that people bring up when talking about "the founding fathers couldn't predict the technology of the future".

It's Viper week, you know what that means /sfg/
Now we begin the long wait towards Alex....

Alright /sfg/ you drive a hard bargain, you can take away special moves out of drive rush, but you must give one thing in return

Drive rush can now be cancelled into backdash

>>211971492
>it took months of courting
for some mid pussy

>>16700006
>we should reject all three
And then what? Suddenly all your proofs in the very basics of any discipline become unreasonably complicated just for some “philosophical” reason
>no Hamel basis guaranteed for every vector space
>some free modules are suddenly not free anymore, have to come up with tedious criteria to see what went wrong
>basically any result about lattices (topologies on a set, group lattices, ring ideals, manifold atlases, etc etc) is thrown out the window and you have to develop a whole framework for each to decide if a maximal element exists
>the only area not affected is analysis because Schauder bases of TVS can rely on Dependent Choice instead