>>83007158
What I am thinking of specifically is Page 244 of the Red book
>If you are boys, your God is a woman.
>If you are women, your God is a boy.
>If you are men, your God is a maiden.
>The God is where you are not.
>So: it is wise that one has a God; this serves for you perfection.
>The Maiden is the pregnant future.
>A boy is the engendering future.
>A woman is: having given birth.
>A man is: having engendered.
>So: if you are childlike beings now, your God will descend from the height of ripeness to age and death.
>But if you are developed beings, having engendered or given birth, in body or in soul, so your God rises from the radiant cradle, to the incalculable height of the future, to the maturity and fullness of the coming time.
>He who still has his life before him is a child.
>He who lives life in the present is developed.
>If you thus live all that you can live, you are developed.
>He who is a child in this time, his God dies.
>He who is developed in this time, his God continues to live. -Carl Jung
Now as I've matured and grown Closer to Yah, I've noticed that Jung doesn't have a Hebraic understanding of "God", he doesn't know Father as Christ knew Father.
Jung understood "God" psychologically, as a symbol of what the soul lacks or projects outwards, but it is not the same as our Creator, our Elohim, as Most High Father Almighty YHWH, the Living Father.
When Jung says "your God," He's describing an archetypical process within the psyche that occurs when you spiritually mature, *BOTH* in flesh and in spirit. He is not concerned with the worship of the Almighty. His "God" rises and falls with the stages of human development, as if God is inside us and a creation of ourselves, blasphemy.
In Hebraic truth, YHWH does not "rise or fall." He is One. He is unchanging, eternal, the source of being itself. Jung's view is inward and symbolic; Jung analyzed the symbols of man's striving towards meaning. The prophets Revealed the One who gives meaning.