>>17928584
>You believe that Allah's word will come and take on flesh
No, the Quran is an uncreated instance of the eternal attribute of speech that was spoken in time. You believe Jesus is the word as in God's ability to speak and not in the same sense we do. Furthermore you also believe him to be created and eternal which makes absolutely no sense. We also don't believe those representations to be divine persons that are part of God in any sense of the word.
>adamantly insisted he never did
Where? Scholars accept that if the previous nations used the term it wouldn't have been wrong or inaccurate of them, the same way God in the bible tells the Israelites to refer to him by a different name to avoid any idolatrous association. Something being given power is not the same as the thing possessing power inherently
>Omnipotence is being able to do anything
That's the definition I am using, the one generally used by philosophers too. The rest you have added is a straw man. Creatio ex nihilo is an example of a logically possible thing that only God can do but you cannot.
>Going to Hell isn't impossible since people can do it.
Yes because we are human beings and not divine. God in the bible says he cannot lie because he is not human for example.
>>17928593
>Same with the Son
You said there was a state of affairs where the trinity could have been different so no it is absolutely not the same.
>I am in the Father and the Father is in me
He also prayed for believers to be one in the Father the same way he is. Did he make you God?
>You're rejecting from me
No I am not. As I said that was a different person. What is curious though is why you a prottie even cares about the church fathers. I can demonstrate how St. Irenaeus believes differently from you anyway and how most of them (prior to Nicaea) could be considered heretics